Pacer Case Study
Comfy WomfyCharleston, SC · on Feather PMS
Client Case Study · Comfy Womfy

Fewer nights sold. More revenue collected.

On the units that have stayed in the program the full year, Pacer pushed same-store ADR up 14.6% year over year, growing same-store revenue 4.4% even as nights sold pulled back 9%. The portfolio is priced and managed entirely through Feather's PMS integration.

28 Units · Same-StoreCharleston, SCJan 1–Aug 4, 2026 vs LYSource: Pacer platform, stay dates
+14.6%
Same-Store ADR vs LY
+4.4%
Same-Store Revenue vs LY · $573.9K
28
Units, Same-Store Cohort
Aug 2025
Partnered With Pacer Since
The Approach

Rate discipline over occupancy chasing

Comfy Womfy's Charleston-area portfolio came into 2026 pricing to fill nights. Pacer's revenue management shifted the strategy toward defending rate, even where it meant giving up some volume, on the units that have been under management the full comparison window.

Jan 1–Aug 4, 2025
$549,879
4,176 nights · $131.68 ADR
Jan 1–Aug 4, 2026
$573,922
3,802 nights · $150.95 ADR

Same-store cohort: 28 units with confirmed reservation activity in both the Jan 1–Aug 4, 2025 and Jan 1–Aug 4, 2026 windows. Figures reflect unit-level rate and revenue performance for that cohort, not total portfolio unit count. Source: Pacer platform (core reservation data), pulled 2026-08-04.

By The Numbers

Same-store performance, year over year

Revenue
$573.9K
↑ 4.4% vs LY
ADR
$150.95
↑ 14.6% vs LY
Nights Sold
3,802
↓ 9.0% vs LY
Built On Feather

Managed end to end on Feather's PMS

Comfy Womfy's rates, floors, and availability are set day to day directly through Feather. If you're a Feather operator and want a second look at your own rate strategy, Pacer's revenue managers work inside your existing stack, no PMS switch required.

Pacer Revenue Management · pacerrev.com · Jon Latorre, Founder